|
Subject: Re: How is this part of the XSLT specification to be interpreted? From: Warren Hedley <w.hedley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 15:10:11 -0400 |
David Carlisle wrote: > > can't you put structured comments into an element in an extension > namespace, so long as you provide an empty fallback? Jeni suggested this in a later response - it's a much more satisfactory (XSL ethical?) solution. You don't need to use a fallback. This is actually what the exclude-result-prefixes attribute is for - previously I'd only used it for removing declarations of namespaces that I'd use when matching elements in my input documents. Very cool. -- Warren Hedley XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: How is this part of the XSLT sp, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: How is this part of the XSLT sp, David Carlisle |
| Re: Creating different types of out, Jeni Tennison | Date | RE: Donating RenderX to FOP, DuCharme, Robert |
| Month |