Subject: Re: Machine-readable comments (Was: How is this part of the XSLT specification to be interpreted?) From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 18:12:57 -0600 (MDT) |
> Mike Brown says: > >Comments are not required to be reported by an XML parser, so you should > >never depend on being able to process them with XSLT. > > Isn't that a little harsh? If I know what parser I'll be using, and I > know that the stylesheets won't be going to a place where an unknown > parser is used, why not have specially-structured comments? You are correct. Under those circumstances, it is not unreasonable. - Mike ____________________________________________________________________ Mike J. Brown, software engineer at My XML/XSL resources: webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA http://www.skew.org/xml/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Machine-readable comments (Was: How, David_Marston | Thread | xsl script, zze-wokup balr001 |
Re: Changing values of parameters f, RSuiter | Date | RE: passing a parameter to select a, Ryan Daigle |
Month |