|
Subject: Flat puzzle. (Re: <xsl:stylesheet xmlns...) From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@xxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 19:49:39 -0700 |
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Muench
> Why did we do it? To get feedback from users like you and
> Sebastian and the countless others on this list who were
> creating the "tons of use cases" by trying out these "beta"
> releases and vocally reporting the feedback.
This is very good. I wish you already got something like
'Flat puzzle' described below.
<LONG_LIST_OF_OBJS>
<A>content</A>
<B dep="A">content</B>
<C dep="B">content</C>
<D/>
<E dep="nowhere"/>
....
</LONG_LIST_OF_OBJS>
I should produce
a group with Tile "A B C", because there
are dependencies. ( With the Title "A B C" and <ol>
then bunch of <li>'s ( <li> for A, <li> for B <li> for C. )
and </ol>,
a group of 'nodependencies' ( same structure )
a group of 'baddependencies' ( same structure ).
Mind to share a solution? ( Smells that key() could be
a workaround for missing updateable variables ).
Sofar everything I'm producing looks soo ugly ...
comparing to trivial:
'iterate once -> create intermediate structures -> merge"
in any programming language
Many thanks.
Rgds.Paul.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: <xsl:stylesheet xmlns..., Steve Muench | Thread | Re: Flat puzzle. (Re: <xsl:styleshe, Steve Muench |
| RE: key(). ( Re: Saxon VS XT ), Paulo Gaspar | Date | RE: Saxon VS XT, Joshua Allen |
| Month |