| Subject: Re: Merging and Quines From: Tom Mullen <Tom.Mullen@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 12:16:49 +0000 (GMT) | 
Oliver,
>Using Xalan on an 800 node xml file (example node below)  I get the
>following timings for versions 1.2 & 1.3 of your merge xslt:
>
>V1.2 1688618 millisecs
>V1.3 1639537 millisecs
>
>(both ~30 mins)
>
Humblest apologies, I feel I may have been doing you a disservice (albeit
with the help of "XALAN Version 1.1D01 XML4J Version Xerces 1.1.1").
I had a suspicion that XALAN was greedy with memory for the key() solution
so switched to saxon to try it out.  I was initially annoyed because I
thought Saxon had crashed without issuing an error message, until I noticed
that it had actually completed succesfully.  I revisited your merge
stylesheets with the 800 node example and found that Saxon executed it
within a matter of some 30 seconds (an improvement on 30mins!).
Needless to say, I've now switched to Saxon.
Apologies once again,
Tom Mullen
-----------------------------------------------------------------
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: Merging and Quines, Tom Mullen | Thread | Re: Merging and Quines, Oliver Becker | 
| Re: AW: matching nodes by their val, Oliver Becker | Date | Re: Understanding xsl:key, Jeni Tennison | 
| Month |