Re: [xsl] the nearest ancestor with the attribute

[Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Oliver:

At 09:27 AM 1/16/01 +0100, you wrote:
> > ancestor::*/@attr
> >    gets you the attribute nodes themselves (from nearest to furthest)
> >    this is often good enough, because if (for example), you ask for the
> >    value of this node set, you'll get the value of the first one (the 
> nearest)
>
> I don't think so. The first in this case is the first in document order,
> which isn't the nearest in the ancestor axis.

Hm. About this, see XPath 2.4. ancestor is a reverse axis. I don't see 
anything here that changes the order to document order.

>  The value of a node-set is
> *always* the value of the first node in document order.

Oops! You're right about this. XPath 4.2. Somehow I had it in my head that 
it was the first in the set. (Maybe an earlier version of the spec had it 
that way?) Thanks for helping me upgrade my brain.

> Knowing the right order appears to be a little bit confusing sometimes.

That's for sure.

Regards,
Wendell

======================================================================
Wendell Piez                            mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================


XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list