Subject: RE: [xsl] the nearest ancestor with the attribute From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:15:03 -0000 |
> No. The "order" of an axis only "rules" for the step that it is in, ie > it affects the meaning of position() and last() in predicates > that occur > in that step. It doesn't affect the constructed node set. And the last step has the say on which way the nodes are used for position() and last() in any predicate? A/B/C[last()] then should mean that whatever axis is used in step C determines if document order or reverse order is 'in play' for the predicates? Not forgetting any shorthand expansion :-) DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Can sets have order?, Uche Ogbuji | Thread | Re: [xsl] the nearest ancestor with, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] Checking for unique mail , Michael Beddow | Date | Re: [xsl] Checking for unique mail , Heiner de Wendt |
Month |