|
Subject: Re: [xsl] the nearest ancestor with the attribute From: Oliver Becker <obecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:49:23 +0100 (MET) |
> I find it is more succinct to say: "Nodes from the attribute and namespace
> axes are always in an arbitrary implementation-defined order, while nodes
> from all other axes are in proximity order within location step expressions
> and in document order in location path expressions."
Although nobody asked, just a little add-on: (for the faq?)
Nodes from different documents are also in an arbitrary implementation-defined
order.
<xsl:for-each select="document('doc1.xml')//* | document('doc2.xml')//*">
...
</xsl:for-each>
Regards,
Oliver
/-------------------------------------------------------------------\
| ob|do Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker |
| --+-- E-Mail: obecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| op|qo WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker |
\-------------------------------------------------------------------/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] the nearest ancestor with, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] [ANN] XSLTDoc Beta, Jeni Tennison |
| Re: [xsl] template pattern does not, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] the nearest ancestor with, Jeni Tennison |
| Month |