Subject: RE: [xsl] Regex string function question From: Rick Anderson <rianders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 05:37:24 -0500 (EST) |
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Michael Kay wrote: > > Why won't us put a prosal for a standardised [regexp] extension ? > > > Doing an extension function that tests whether a string matches a regexp is > very easy, once you've found a definition of "regular expression" that > everyone can agree on. An extension function that uses a regexp to extract > parts of a string is much trickier. > > Mike Kay > The jakarta project has two regexp packages for Java: http://jakarta.apache.org/regexp/ http://jakarta.apache.org/oro/index.html Since XSL 2.0 isn't out yet would it be reasonable to add those kind of extensions to a java based XSL processor using one of those libraries? Has anyone tried this yet? --Rick Anderson XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Regex string function que, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Regex string function que, Alexey Gokhberg |
RE: [xsl] XML 2 XML how to c final , Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Regex string function que, Alexey Gokhberg |
Month |