|
Subject: RE: [xsl] lists From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:24:54 -0000 |
> > I can't think of an XSLT way of doing this.
>
> There's probably an XSLT way, once you specify the transform that
> you wish to use.
>
> For example I think that the following meets the requirements
> as stated.
>
> <xsl:template match="list"/>
>
> ie the suggested input would be transformed to something that
> validated
> against the suggested DTD.
OK. I would like not to lose content, nor change source document
sequence, I.e. not lose content sequence.
My source actually reads.
<varlistentry><term>Node type</term>
<listitem><para>Node type specifies what kind of nodes to match. If the
value is a name or the argument is omitted, the type is assumed to
be an element. For all other types, you need to use a keyword:</para>
<variablelist>
<varlistentry><term><literal>#text</literal></term>
<listitem><para>Matches contiguous strings of character
data</para></listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry><term><literal>#pi</literal></term>
<listitem><para>Matches processing instructions</para></listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry><term><literal>#comment</literal></term>
<listitem><para>Matches comments</para></listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry><term><literal>#element</literal> or
<literal>*</literal></term>
<listitem><para>Matches any element, regardless of name</para></listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry><term><literal>#all</literal></term>
<listitem><para>Matches any node</para></listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
<para>For example, <literal>descendant(1,#all)</literal> matches
any node, whether it is an element, positive integer, comment, or text
string. The term <literal>descendant(1,*)</literal> matches any element, and
<literal>descendant(1,buttercup)</literal> matches any element of
type <sgmltag class="element">buttercup</sgmltag>.</para></listitem>
</varlistentry>
I.e. the variablelist's are nested, with content inside varlistentry
prior to the start of the new variablelist.
The dirty solution is to close of the listitem in the output,
with </listitem> after the initial content,
insert the new <list></list>
then continue with the <listitem> in the output.
thats a 'dirty' (non xslt approach).
Regards DaveP
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] lists, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] Trying to use the SUM functio, desimonp |
| Re: [xsl] Can sets have order?, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Linebreaks in TOC, DPawson |
| Month |