Subject: Re: [xsl] double indirection with keys? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:57:20 GMT |
> But the XPath-Spec seems to indicate that predicates are not allowed > inside predicates. No, they are allowed. > The relevant pieces of the my source-document The key you showed had elements from an fo: namespace what namespace is that (XSL FO?) in any event they didn't appear to be any such in th einput fragment you showed. without keys it would appear that you want <xsl:if test"'fixed' =/*/*/style:font-decl[@style:name= /*/*/style:style[@style:name=current()/@text:style-name]/@style:font-name ]/@style:font-pitch"> (untested, optimising with keys left as exercise for reader) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] double indirection with keys?, Tobias Grundmann | Thread | Re: [xsl] double indirection with k, Tobias Grundmann |
RE: [xsl] Removing Duplicates, by way of Mulberry T | Date | [xsl] MSXML3 CAB File Redistributab, Joshua Allen |
Month |