Subject: Re: [xsl] context-independent counter From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:30:03 GMT |
> Then I need a > context-independent-counter, that doesn't care about > the position, the level, or any other aspect of the > current node's context. No, you first select the nodes that you do need, then position() will refer to the position in that list. You never _need_ an updatable variable. Declarative programming languages have the same expressive power as procedural ones. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] context-independent count, Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: [xsl] context-independent count, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] context-independent count, Jeni Tennison | Date | RE: [xsl] context-independent count, Tobias Reif |
Month |