RE: [xsl] i18n approach

Subject: RE: [xsl] i18n approach
From: Ben Robb <b.robb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:34:29 -0000
If we are being pedantic:

<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
                version="1.0"
                >

<xsl:template match="/">
    Nor would your one *grin*
</xsl:template>

</xsl:stylesheet>

-----Original Message-----
From: Dylan Walsh [mailto:Dylan.Walsh@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 08 February 2001 09:58
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [xsl] i18n approach


<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
                version="1.0"
                >

<xsl:template match="/">
    David,
	That stylesheet wouldn't work with any XML. :-)
</xsl:template>

</xsl:stylesheet>

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	David Carlisle [SMTP:davidc@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent:	Monday, February 05, 2001 11:59 PM
> To:	xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:	Re: [xsl] i18n approach
> 
> 
> JT> In order to use a single XSLT stylesheet on a particular set of source
> JT> XML files, they need to have something in common.
> 
> 
> <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
>                 version="1.0"
>                 >
> 
> <xsl:template match="/">
>  Jeni, 
>   just to prove you wrong,
>     David
> </xsl:stylesheet>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
> delivered
> through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information
> visit
> http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread