Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments
From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:39:11 +0700
Adam Van Den Hoven wrote:
> If I write a document that I can say is 100% XSLT
> compliant, then I demand that when I use that document in a processor that
> is 100% compliant the resulting output is exactly as I have specified.

This is not the case in XSLT 1.0.  For example:

- Stylesheets that use extensions (whether extension functions or
extension elements) are 100% XSLT compliant, but there is not guarantee
that a processor will be able to handle them.

- XSLT 1.0 also allows extension of output methods and sorting
datatypes, which are not guaranteed to be supported.

- XSLT 1.0 processors are not required to support


 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread