Subject: [xsl] Re: XSLT 1.1 comments From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 03:11:30 -0800 (PST) |
James Clark wrote: > Adam Van Den Hoven wrote: > > > If I write a document that I can say is 100% XSLT > > compliant, then I demand that when I use that document in a processor that > > is 100% compliant the resulting output is exactly as I have specified. > > This is not the case in XSLT 1.0. For example: > > - Stylesheets that use extensions (whether extension functions or > extension elements) are 100% XSLT compliant, but there is not guarantee > that a processor will be able to handle them. > > - XSLT 1.0 also allows extension of output methods and sorting > datatypes, which are not guaranteed to be supported. > > - XSLT 1.0 processors are not required to support > disable-output-escaping. I would add to this list yet another item: - the result of xsl:sort may be different on different XSLT processors. Dimitre Novatchev. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XSLT Difference between xalan, Albert Tsun | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: XSLT 1.1 comments, Uche Ogbuji |
Re: [xsl] Sorting problem..., cutlass | Date | Re: [xsl] XPath expression "everyth, Jeni Tennison |
Month |