Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:30:06 GMT |
With scripts, it is implied that a full implementation of the interpreter is availabele. No, not at all. If you use xsl:script to bind the same extension namespace to a java method, some vbscript inlined in the stylesheet and a perl function accessed by some qname, then you are not implying that an XSL system implements java, perl and vbscript. You are implying that you hope that the XSL system might implement one of them. Forget xsl:script is called script it isn't about adding scripting where before there is none, it is about offering an idirection that allows different implementations of functions bound to the same namespace URI so that extension functions in that namespace may be portable to more than one processor. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Uche Ogbuji |
Re: [xsl] XSL rule for sorting the , Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] Saxon Quirk, Dave Hartnoll |
Month |