Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:02:48 -0000 |
> Would it be possible for XSL implementors to agree on a > common extension > namespace for some of these (that is explicitly an _experimental_ > extension and does not imply later acceptance by W3C) I think it would be very nice if someone set up a namespace for experimental extension elements and functions with some simple rules: * Anyone can define a function and register it in this namespace provided that - the name is not already registered - they provide a clear specification of what the function does - the function is intrinsically portable (i.e. it is theoretically capable of being implemented on any processor or any platform) - the function is free of side-effects - there is a four-week period for comments and discussion before the spec is frozen - the person registering the function provides open source implementation(s) that work with at least one processor - there is an opportunity for other people to provide implementation(s) for other processors. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments, Uche Ogbuji |
RE: [xsl] Escaping Characters in Dy, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] [XSLT] - Recognize an XML nod, Nicola Martella |
Month |