Re: Stylesheet portability (Long) (Was: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments)

Subject: Re: Stylesheet portability (Long) (Was: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments)
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 23:50:09 GMT
> I find that absurd!

well no different to my usual ramblings then.

But I think you misunderstood my remark. I was just trying to provoke a
resonse as to what people meant by "portable" (because I didn't know
what they meant and suspected they meant different things)

I was giving an example of a possible meaning of "portable" as meaning
portable between current implementations. Which for me today on the
implemetations I have on this machine imples not using keys.
when I said _for me_ portable means that I meant that for me (only)
that would be a consequence of that definition of portable.

I wasn't trying to suggest that people shouldn't use keys. I use them
myself whenever necessary (and then just don't use xt)


This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread