Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template

Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:49:10 GMT

> I was just suggesting that there be a "xf" namespace 
> such that:

Oh yes, so you were, sorry!

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template), (continued) Jeni Tennison - Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:17:22 +0000 David Carlisle - Sun, 18 Feb 2001 17:45:19 GMT Clark C. Evans - Sun, 18 Feb 2001 20:56:23 -0500 (EST) Jeni Tennison - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:16:18 +0000 David Carlisle - Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:49:10 GMT <= Clark C. Evans - Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:45:16 -0500 (EST) Uche Ogbuji - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:32:43 -0700 Jeni Tennison - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:55:05 +0000 Uche Ogbuji - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 22:52:42 -0700

Current Thread

Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was: Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call-template), (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call, Jeni Tennison	Thread	Re: [xsl] RE: syntax sugar for call, Clark C. Evans
[xsl] problem with Xalan_J_2_0_0, Henri Delebecque	Date	Re: [xsl] news, David Carlisle
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home