Subject: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT functions From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:59:08 -0000 |
> > Saxon allows xsl:for-each with saxon:function, but doesn't allow > > saxon:return within xsl:for-each. > > Did you see the use cases that I put forward where it could be > useful?: > > What do you think? > There's some logic to it: it suggests that <xsl:break> within an ordinary <xsl:for-each> could also be defined cleanly, as "discard any result nodes generated beyond this point". Could be useful: <xsl:template match="h1"> <section> <xsl:for-each select="following-sibling::*"> <xsl:if test="h1"><xsl:break/></xsl:if> <xsl:apply-templates/> </xsl:for-each> </section> </xsl:template> An alternative to saxon:leading(). I quite like it. I wouldn't like it if you could achieve this effect by writing a function and not achieve the same effect inline. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Clark C. Evans | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT func, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT func, David . Rosenborg | Date | Re: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT func, Uche Ogbuji |
Month |