|
Subject: [xsl] thanks, also thoughts on xsl:script and xsl:function From: "Dave Gomboc" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:16:12 -0700 |
Various bits of good advice from (in alphabetical order by last name ;-)
David Carlisle, Peter Flynn, Mike Kay, and Jeni Tennison helped me to
eventually identify the problem:
<!DOCTYPE ROOT [
<!ENTITY % character_entities SYSTEM "character_entities.dtd">
%character_entities;
<!ENTITY events SYSTEM "events.sgml">
>
It's easy to miss that closing square bracket! **Argh!**
Re: <xsl:script>, I've done some more thinking about this, and have come
around to the view that having a common binding per language is better
than not having one. I would prefer not to see other languages inlined
within XSLT source -- I take it that there must be a substantial user
base that needs to have everything packages in one file instead of (for
example) one per language? Support for an <xsl:binding>, without inline
scripting, is about as far as I have swung so far.
Finally, wouldn't it be useful for <xsl:function> to return multiple
items? (Though I guess it would have to be called <xsl:relation>
instead! :-) Sure, it is possible to encapsulate multiple values into a
single one to get around this, just as it is in many other languages,
but why create the need to?
Dave
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] best way to divide select, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] thanks, also thoughts on , Jeni Tennison |
| Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Clark C. Evans | Date | Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, David . Rosenborg |
| Month |