Subject: Re: The top 10 limitations of XSLT 1.0 (was RE: [xsl] RE: Designs for XSLT functions) From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 23:05:56 -0500 (EST) |
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Andrew Kimball wrote: > If the top 10 limitations of XSLT 1.0 were solved, then I think the roar > of demand for xsl:script and xsl:evaluate would be reduced to a whimper. Hurray! > 1. The lack of real string comparison > 2. No support for dates > 3. No simple mechanism for grouping > 4. No querying into RTF's 5. More node-set operations: intersect, union, and equals 6. Poor support for modulization (template calling syntax sucks) 7. No ability to create functions in XSLT callable from XPath XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
The top 10 limitations of XSLT 1.0 , Andrew Kimball | Thread | RE: The top 10 limitations of XSLT , Michael Kay |
Re: Designs for XSLT functions (Was, Joe English | Date | Re: The top 10 limitations of XSLT , Clark C. Evans |
Month |