Subject: Re: [xsl] Poluting XSLT??? (Was Re: Designs for XSLT functions ) From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:05:18 -0700 |
> Maybe we need a separate mailing list, dedicated to XSLT language evolution > and development, where implementors will be the driving force and perform more > analytical work than sociological surveys. I quite agree, and my having fallen a week behind on this important discussion because of the general lists's volume is an example. I am an implementor who is very interested in experimentation with these ideas. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Poluting XSLT??? (Was Re:, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Displaying Problem., Srinivas, Santoshkum |
RE: [xsl] what is biztalk ??, Max Dunn | Date | RE: [xsl] what is biztalk ??, Darshan Singh |
Month |