Re: [xsl] position() oddity?

Subject: Re: [xsl] position() oddity?
From: Peter Flynn <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:58:03 +2400
At Wednesday, 28 February 2001, Steve wrote:

>Peter, this is expected behavior. Here's why:

I knew there was an answer. I'm still thinking in SGML. Smack wrist.

///Peter







 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread