Subject: Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to withdraw xsl:script from XSLT 1.1 From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 14:59:07 -0500 (EST) |
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Eric van der Vlist wrote: > I hope I am not too heavily biased by the RDBMS vendor I was working for > at that time, but I remember many constraints such as cursors being > considered as static variables that had a huge impact on the programming > style that did not exist when you were using the native APIs that where > roughly similar to ODBC or JDBC. Oh yea! I completely agree that Embedded SQL in C was a nightmare of a language. And in general, I prefer component based mechanisms through a clean API abstrction layer instead -- which is what I feel is needed with XSLT (and you mention this below). > The basic problem of embedding a language into another is the mixing > of instructions with different scopes... Neat point. I've never thought of it that way! > To come back to to XSLT embedding XSLT within a general purpose language > would be as bad an idea as embedding the general language within XSLT Well, I personally agree with this, but I didn't want to preclude this as I know there are people out there that love embeding one language within another. I concede that the first point was poorly worded. I was trying to say "just don't embedd X language in XSL", not "please embeed XSL in language X". My bad. Perhaps this should be listed as another 'bug in the proposal. Clark XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to wit, Eric van der Vlist | Thread | Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to wit, cutlass |
RE: [xsl] XML to WML/CHTML example , Pavanan Archana | Date | Re: [xsl] ANNOUNCE: Petition to wit, cutlass |
Month |