Subject: RE: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:script + an essential layer ofindirection From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 11:40:39 -0500 (EST) |
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Michael Kay wrote: > > First, this syntax makes a big difference, it is not merely > > syntax sugar. With implements="a-unique-uri" I can now put > > all of my scripts in a module and share this module across the > > organization. With implements-prefix="prefix", I have to > > coordinate prefixes across my enterprise in order to > > have a central set of scripts? Yuck. Talk about a > > maintance nightmare. > > No, of course you don't, you can use a different prefix in each stylesheet > module. As always its the namespace URI that must match, not the prefix. > Perhaps the keyword "implements-prefix" confused you, it really means > "implements-namespace-denoted-by-prefix", just as "exclude-result-prefix" > means "exclude-result-namespace-denoted-by-prefix". Yes. This was exactly my problem. ;) Clark XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xbind:module == xsl:scrip, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] RDDL as a delivery vehicl, Clark C. Evans |
[xsl] Cache problem, James Brown | Date | Re: [xsl] [exsl] EXSLT 1.0 - Common, Jeni Tennison |
Month |