Subject: Re: [xsl] [exsl] EXSLT 1.0 - Common, Sets and Math From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 17:06:47 GMT |
> I think that just throwing everything in isn't quite enough: we need > to discuss the functionality of some of the extensions - yes, especially in the beginning, but a year down the line and you get an email from (say) Michael and a representative of the evil empire saying they've both implemented foobangwhizz(spodge) so can it go into exslt so users can use it portably on both their systems. At that point do you want to vet the semantics of the function, or do you just want to say. It's implemented <here>, documented <here> so others can implement, and no one else has used the name exslt:foobangwhizz -- so it goes in. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [exsl] EXSLT 1.0 - Common, Jeni Tennison | Thread | Re: [xsl] [exsl] EXSLT 1.0 - Common, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] <xsl:sort> using a derive, Jeni Tennison | Date | [xsl] Seeking XPATH, Paul Bell |
Month |