Subject: RE: [xsl] functions and XSLT From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:48:22 -0000 |
> From: Colin Muller > If you based the repository around conformance tests, you'd partly > remove the need for human review of version changes and new > implementations. Mulberrytech hosts a not dissimilar library of Scheme / DSSSL functions. I like the idea. I'm tempted to host it along with the faq. Regards DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] functions and XSLT, David . Rosenborg | Thread | [xsl] calculating the length ??, Nielsen Anders Rolan |
RE: [xsl] Re:, DPawson | Date | Re: [xsl] Resend: Is there a way .., Jeni Tennison |
Month |