Subject: Re: [xsl] Testing for Parent Nodes of multiple types From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:08:24 GMT |
> Although David Carlisle now has me thinking. Sorry, I'll try not to do that again:-) > My opinion on this would be that each node can > have multiple children so therefore each child would > have to checked (David's approach). You haven't said what you are doing in case the test is true or false. In some circumstances by moving the code up to the relevant parent templates you mightavoid all checking, but it depends quite what you are doing. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Testing for Parent Nodes , Ciaran Byrne | Thread | [xsl]passing node data as a paramet, Edlavitch, Ben |
RE: [xsl] Proposed syntactic sugar:, Chris Bayes | Date | Re: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Compli, Carmelo Montanez |
Month |