RE: [xsl] Comment about XSLT Complier?

["Ball, Mike" <Mike.Ball@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Dylan

> 
> >The speed was unimpressive - no faster than Xalan 1 from the command
> >line  on my limited and unscientific test - but then it is only an
> alpha
> >version and I would guess this will improve.
> 
> Such a test is measures the time it takes to start the Java VM to a
> greater extent than it measures the speed of transformation. This is
> true of any Java XSLT processor. 

My timings for the XSLT compiler were obtained from within a Java
application and therefore aren't affected by JVM initialisation time and my
Xalan timings were the numbers produced by Xalan itself for the
transformation step only. I believe these give a like-with-like comparison.

> You need to get it running and do
> multiple transformations to benchmark it correctly.

I agree entirely. I did say my tests were limited and unscientific. 

> There are benchmarks on the web which show the XSLTC to be a good
> performer.

Oh good! Could you point me at a URL for these benchmarks? I've seen figures
for other XSLT processors but not for XSLTC. 

Regards

Mike Ball

 
Application Services Consultant
Software AG UK

-- 
The content of this e-mail is confidential, may contain privileged material
and is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above. If you receive this
in error, please notify Software AG immediately and delete this e-mail.

Software AG (UK) Limited
Registered in England & Wales 1310740
Registered Office: Hudson House, Hudson Way,
Pride Park, Derby DE24 8HS

-- 
The content of this e-mail is confidential, may contain privileged material
and is intended solely for the recipient(s) named above. If you receive this
in error, please notify Software AG immediately and delete this e-mail.

Software AG (UK) Limited
Registered in England & Wales 1310740
Registered Office: Hudson House, Hudson Way,
Pride Park, Derby DE24 8HS

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list