Subject: Re: [xsl] browsers with XSL capabilities From: Peter Flynn <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 18:27:08 +0000 |
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Robert wrote: > Could uyou point me to some. I am looking for an editor that uses the same > XSL to style the look for the editor and the end result and what the user > would be editing is the actual XML content. So what the editor sees will be > what they get when it is in the final HTML. Not XSL. In fact I don't know any typographic editor on any platform that uses XSL as its native stylesheet format yet (I'd would _love_ to try one out if one exists). Editors for non-Win platforms include epcEdit, Epic, at least three other European ones whose names escape me (one from Luxembourg, one from Scandinavia, and one from France, all of which I saw at the Paris XML show last year), Emacs (non-typographic), and one or two data editors (one announced on this list recently, I think). I didn't realise you wanted WYSIWYG. XMetaL is the best balance between price and capability I have seen yet: they know Linux users want it, and I suspect they are waiting for WINE to come up with the goodies... ///Peter, case-hardened Emacs/psgml user XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] browsers with XSL capabil, Robert Koberg | Thread | Re: [xsl] browsers with XSL capabil, Bart Schuller |
Re: [xsl] browsers with XSL capabil, Robert Koberg | Date | Re: [xsl] Is XSLT the right name?, Clark C. Evans |
Month |