Subject: Re: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:result (Was: Re: [xsl] Functional programming in XSLT) From: "Dave Gomboc" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:30:17 -0700 |
> From: "Lassi A. Tuura" lat@xxxxxx [snip] > Basically, why couldn't I say this? > > <xsl:call-template name="xref-to"> > <xsl:with-param name="node"> > <xsl:for-each select="document('glossary.xml')"> > <xsl:copy-of select="id($target)"/> > </xsl:for-each> > </xsl:with-param> > </xsl:call-template> [snip] I think similarly about this (allow the return and manipulation of source nodes in XSLT templates so that tasks such as set intersection may be defined in XSLT) but people seem to think this would not only untenable but even weird. Having neither the time nor the inclination to really dig into the related issues myself (e.g. ramifications for other parts of XSLT, interaction with XPath) like some others have, I just shrugged and went back to my day job. Dave Gomboc XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] escaping <![CDATA[, Steve Muench | Thread | [xsl] xsl:call-template, Mika . Borner |
RE: [exsl] Naming exsl:return/exsl:, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Which xmlns:xsl to use ?, Sachidanandam E.K |
Month |