Subject: Re: [xsl] Can one element have more than one namespaces? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:59:41 +0100 |
JT> The example you're missing is: JT> JT> <x:A xmlns:x="" /> JT> JT> which is almost exactly the same as: JT> JT> <A xmlns:x="" /> except that the first one doesn't conform to the namespace spec so would be rejected by a namespace aware parser:-) To answer Dave P's question > Which leaves the 'null' ns and no ns declaration. > Equivalent? More or less. It is really a mis match of terminoligy. The namespace spec does not admit to a concept of a "null namespace" it says that in the absence of any declarations <A/> is not in a namespace. However, XPath, in common with some other systems needs _something_ to return for the namespace, to denote the lack of a namespace. It uses the empty string for this so if you are using such a system it is (perhaps) natural to refer to elements that are not in a namespace as being in the "empty" or "null" namespace. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Can one element have more, Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: [xsl] Can one element have more, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] <A> with parameters, Julian F. Reschke | Date | RE: [xsl] Can one element have more, DPawson |
Month |