|
Subject: Re: [xsl] a very unusual namespace question From: Oliver Becker <obecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 13:23:32 +0200 (MET DST) |
> In most processors you will then be able to use the $ns-prefix to
> indicate the namespace that you're after. The only problem is that
> processors don't *have* to use the prefix you've specified when you
> create the attribute:
>
> "XSLT processors may make use of the prefix of the QName specified
> in the name attribute when selecting the prefix used for outputting
> the created attribute as XML; however, they are not required to do
> so and, if the prefix is xmlns, they must not do so."
>
> so it's not guaranteed (although I don't know of a processor that
> doesn't).
Some kind of conformance test maybe?
XML:
<el xmlns:prefix="uri1" prefix:att="foo" />
XSLT:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:template match="el">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:copy-of select="@*" />
<xsl:attribute name="prefix:att2"
namespace="uri2">bar</xsl:attribute>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Expected output?
XT and Saxon choose a different prefix (fine),
Xalan 2.0.1 ignores my namespace declaration to be "uri2" (wrong).
Cheers,
Oliver
/-------------------------------------------------------------------\
| ob|do Dipl.Inf. Oliver Becker |
| --+-- E-Mail: obecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| op|qo WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~obecker |
\-------------------------------------------------------------------/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] a very unusual namespace , Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] How to simplify the xslt expr, Yang |
| Re: [xsl] dubious certification que, jim | Date | [xsl] XSLT Schema, Ingo Schildmann |
| Month |