Subject: RE: XSL history (was RE: [xsl] XSL Sites) From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:40:25 +0100 |
> As in, toning down the 'big bad Microsoft' stuff? That was > tongue-in-cheek; although I'm no fan of MS, I'm happy to give them > credit for their excellent XML tools. I am also happy to say publicly that Microsoft have some excellent XML tools. Which makes it all the more disappointing that their general release browser and operating system products still contain a far-from-excellent processor for a language that is a distant cousin of XSLT, as a result of which I see a high volume of requests for help from users who have got themselves into a serious and expensive mess as a result. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Links XML/XSL, Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: XSL history (was RE: [xsl] XSL , Ben Robb |
RE: [xsl] Links XML/XSL, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] generic method of getting, Michael Kay |
Month |