|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Leading + From: tcn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Trevor Nash) Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 17:59:27 GMT |
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001 12:15:36 +0200 (MET DST), Oliver Becker wrote:
>Hi,
>
>according to the XPath spec, number('+1') should return NaN, shouldn't
>it?. But it seems, XT, Saxon, Xalan and OracleXSL don't agree with me.
>
>Who is right?
IMO you are, though I read Mike Kay's paraphrase of the spec rather
than the real thing.
Saxon 6.2.2 also produces 100 for number('1e2') which is again
"wrong", and I would not be surprised (or upset) if the others do too.
Regards,
Trevor Nash
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Leading +, Johannes Döbler | Thread | [xsl] remove, Todd Diep |
| Re: [xsl] Leading +, Johannes Döbler | Date | Re: [xsl] Generating embedded XSL s, David Carlisle |
| Month |