Subject: Re: [xsl] Leading + From: tcn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Trevor Nash) Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 17:59:27 GMT |
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001 12:15:36 +0200 (MET DST), Oliver Becker wrote: >Hi, > >according to the XPath spec, number('+1') should return NaN, shouldn't >it?. But it seems, XT, Saxon, Xalan and OracleXSL don't agree with me. > >Who is right? IMO you are, though I read Mike Kay's paraphrase of the spec rather than the real thing. Saxon 6.2.2 also produces 100 for number('1e2') which is again "wrong", and I would not be surprised (or upset) if the others do too. Regards, Trevor Nash XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Leading +, Johannes Döbler | Thread | [xsl] remove, Todd Diep |
Re: [xsl] Leading +, Johannes Döbler | Date | Re: [xsl] Generating embedded XSL s, David Carlisle |
Month |