RE: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN

Subject: RE: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN
From: "Schwartz, Rechell R, NLCIO" <rrschwartz@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:35:48 -0400
Is Saxon compatible with the Apache XML Parser (Xerces) or does one
need to install a SAXON XML parser too?

Rechell Schwartz

-----Original Message-----
From: Goetz Bock [mailto:bock@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 12:03 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [xsl] Saxon vs. MSXML vs. XALAN

On Tue, Jun 19 '01 at 10:59, kfricovsky wrote:
> Currently we use XALAN here at work.
> I've been pushing to start using SAXON, because it is what I am most
> familiar with, but I also have heard good things about MSXML.
Xalan and Saxon are both Java programe, MSXML only works on Windows.
> I'm just wondering... Should I look into MSXML instead?
I go with saxon, where ever I can, but I use MSXML 3.0(sp1) for
Clientside XSL-T (it's limited for IE only, but thats ok for these
special cases)


 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread