Re: [xsl] RE: URL for "Things XSLT can't do"

Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: URL for "Things XSLT can't do"
From: Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:31:15 +0100
Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
> DPawson wrote:
> [snip]
> > Sorry if its inconvenient.
> For me this is an example how a valuable WEB resource should not be managed.

the "this" in that sentance might be interpreted as "XSLT-FAQ" rather
than just the alteration of URLs - you might want to clarify this point
as I won't be the only one who feels strongly that XSLT-FAQ is generally
well-managed and in good hands!


 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread