Re: [xsl] recursions?

Subject: Re: [xsl] recursions?
From: Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 06:26:05 +0100
Hi Wendell,

> This would work, wouldn't it Jeni? It's kind of a refinement of the
> count(ancestor::*) technique.

Yep, good point :) (Although if you're doing deep nesting it's
probably slightly more efficient to pass down a parameter as you go
rather than iterate over all the ancestors of each node.)



Jeni Tennison

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread