|
Subject: Re: [xsl] It's going to work, even if it kills me From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 22:45:06 +0100 |
> "In theory xsl can do anything, but what exactly is your problem?" -
> David Carlisle, from the XSL-list
Did I really say that? Not one of my more helpful answers...
Note that even if $keywords was a node set, doing
<xsl:with-param name="keywords">
<xsl:value-of select="$keywords"/>
</xsl:with-param>
would not pass a node set to the templates,
Firstly value-of converts a node set to a string (by taking the string
value of the first node, and discarding all other nodes)
You could use copy-of instead, but then using xsl:with-param in
a form with element content would convert that node set to a result tree
fragment. You can't query into a result tree fragment in standard XSLT
(although most systems provide a node-set extension function to conver
the rtf back to a node set)
You want
<xsl:with-param name="keywords" select="$keywords"/>
then you pass in the node set.
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] It's going to work, even , Robert C. Lyons | Thread | Re: [xsl] It's going to work, even , Tim |
| [xsl] Re: Default attribute value t, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Java code doing transform, Carsten Heinrigs |
| Month |