Re: [xsl] SGML vs XML

Subject: Re: [xsl] SGML vs XML
From: Peter Flynn <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:01:57 +0100
At Thursday, 28 June 2001, SwetaG@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>     I have many times read when i am going through the XML tutorials 
>SGML is too complex to be to be implemented for the web senario 
but i have
>not found any page saying that ok XML is subset of SGML and these 
these are
>the features which are there in SGML but are been excluded from 
the XML for
>removing the complexity of the SGML.Can you please send me those 
>which are not beening included in XML which are there for SGML??

See Question D.4 of the XML FAQ (


 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread
  • [xsl] SGML vs XML
    • SwetaG - Thu, 28 Jun 2001 02:20:00 -0500
      • <Possible follow-ups>
      • Peter Flynn - Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:01:57 +0100 <=