Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 12:23:24 +0100 |
> Perhaps you think it's natural, but in (almost) any procedural language, the > conditional processing comes *outside* the assignment. The political spin is that procedural languages are corrupted by the necessity to mirror the architecture of the machine, declarative programming in general (and functional programming in particular) is more in tune with the natural logic of the algorithm being implemented (but haven't been popular historically as the extra machine processing required has some performance costs) Unfortunately some people have been brainwashed into thinking that C (or even Java) is "natural", and so no longer recognise the "natural" constructs. Don't compare XSL to C, compare it to lisp or ML. David There may be some :-) missing from this message, but I'm not sure. _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re:, Chris Bayes | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re:, Tamre Bond |
Re: [xsl]: Setting the value of var, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Nestled <xsl:choose>, dante |
Month |