| 
 
Subject: RE: [xsl] Reasons behind implicit rules? From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 10:43:22 +0100  | 
> Just wondering why the XSLT WG chose to implement the > implicit rule where > all text not defined by a template undergoes an identity > transformation? My guess is, because this meets the need of most "styling" applications - as the preface to the XSLT spec states, it's these applications that drove the requirements. Mike Kay Software AG XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread | 
|---|
  | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Reasons behind implicit r, Goetz Bock | Thread | [xsl] Incremental DOM->DOM XSLT pro, Luke Matkins | 
| RE: [xsl] Four quick questions abou, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Incremental DOM->DOM XSLT, Michael Kay | 
| Month |