Subject: RE: RE: [xsl] IE browsers From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 22:30:13 +0200 |
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mark > Galbreath > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:27 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: RE: [xsl] IE browsers > > > Only if you want to use the W3C Recommendation for transforms; > without specifically instantiating a 3.0 object with ASP or Java, > the default namespace URI for IE 4.x-5.x is the work group There's is no "default" namespace URI for IE. IE will use MSXML, and depending on the version of MSXML being installed, it will support either "WD-XSL" or "WD-XSL" and "XSLT". Which one is used depends on the namespace URI, not a default. > definition, which is way off the final 1.0 Recommendation, and IE Actually, it's not. Last time I checked, the "WD-XSL" implementation in MSXML did not implement any of the historic drafts correctly. > will not render the transform if the Recommendation URI used in > the XML doc is used with a non-compliant MSXML parser (i.e., 2.0 and 2.5). Right. The XSLT instrctions will be ignored (treated as literal result elements). XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: RE: [xsl] IE browsers, Mark Galbreath | Thread | RE: [xsl] IE browsers, Rosa I-Ting Cheng |
RE: [xsl] dynamic xsl transformatio, Chris Bayes | Date | RE: [xsl] FW: Toggling radio button, Robert Koberg |
Month |