Subject: RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Version 1.0 From: "Chris Bayes" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 14:20:19 +0100 |
> > Mike Kay wrote: > > > The basic idea of having sequences in the data model rather than > > > sets is that the result of sorting a node-set can be > assigned to a > > > variable, something which isn't possible in XSLT 1.0. > There are then > > > mechanisms for > > > iterating over a sequence or indexing into it. > > > > Does that mean that the functions listed in the sequences > part is also > > viable for node-sets? > > Yes, that's the intent. The idea is that a variable which in > XPath 1.0 holds a node-set, should in XPath 2.0 hold a > sequence of nodes, the sequence being in document order with > no duplicates. But what happens when you concatenate 2 sorted sequences together that overlap? Say A C E , D B. You would get A C E D B right? Not A B C D E Ciao Chris XML/XSL Portal http://www.bayes.co.uk/xml XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 , Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 , Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] XSLT browser support, Mitch C. Amiano | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT browser support, cutlass |
Month |