RE: [xsl] FOO vs FO

The RFC makes a simple error though. In asking "why foo", they fail to see the obvious origin of the word. It's from the French "foutre". Which means exactly what the F in FUBAR means. Nothing German at all, except for the fact that they started the war that got us over in France in the first place. American doughboys brought back many corrupted French (and German) phrases but that's a discussion for another list.

At 08:37 9/6/2001, Michael Kay was inspired to say:

> Does anyone know why FOO was chosen to mean anything?
>
No, but someone has tried to find out...

See ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3092.txt

Mike Kay

Cheers!

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] FOO vs FO, (continued) David Carlisle - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:17:46 +0100 Thomas B. Passin - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:18:56 -0400 Carmelo Montanez - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:35:46 -0400 Michael Kay - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:37:42 +0100 Richard Beels - Fri, 07 Sep 2001 11:45:48 -0400 <= Wendell Piez - Thu, 06 Sep 2001 13:49:38 -0400 Jennifer Hochgesang - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:39:36 -0500 Mitch C Amiano - Thu, 06 Sep 2001 16:47:20 -0400 Tony Graham - Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:17:35 +0100

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] FOO vs FO, (continued)
- David Carlisle - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:17:46 +0100
  - Thomas B. Passin - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:18:56 -0400
    - Carmelo Montanez - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:35:46 -0400
- Michael Kay - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:37:42 +0100
  - Richard Beels - Fri, 07 Sep 2001 11:45:48 -0400 <=
- Wendell Piez - Thu, 06 Sep 2001 13:49:38 -0400
  - Jennifer Hochgesang - Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:39:36 -0500
  - Mitch C Amiano - Thu, 06 Sep 2001 16:47:20 -0400
  - Tony Graham - Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:17:35 +0100

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] FOO vs FO, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: [xsl] FOO vs FO, Wendell Piez
RE: [xsl] XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 , Michael Kay	Date	Re: [xsl] XSLT browser support, Pranav
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home