Subject: [xsl] Re: Reference to functions (Was: RE: XPath 2.0: Collection-Valued Expressions (Was: Re: XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators Version 1.0)) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 22:41:13 -0700 (PDT) |
> While I want your needs to be met, yours are not the only needs > under consideration. There are people/companies with demonstrated, > articulated needs for a query language more powerful than XPath and we are > trying to address those requirements, too. Trust me, I will not personally > force you to use that new query language ;^) You are more than welcome to > continue using XPath. > > With tongue firmly in cheek, > Jim Thank you once again. I will continue to use XPath. A logical conclusion from your statement above is that there is a minor typo that has to be corrected -- will you remove "XPath" from the title of the specification? Very thankful and appreciating, Dimitre. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Reference to functions (W, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Re: Reference to functions (W, Jim Melton |
[xsl] Re: Reference to functions (W, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | [xsl] multiple child elements, Sean Kelly |
Month |