Subject: Re: [xsl] Namespace incompatibility b/n XPath 2.0 Data Model and XPath 1.0 (Was Re: XML schema general convert with XSLT (namespaces..)) From: "cutlass" <cutlass@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:58:21 +0100 |
very interesting point. > Another (minor) potential trap is that in XPath 2.0 a > namespace node has no parent. still unclear re this behavior, > > There are two consequences of this decision: > > 1) ../namespace::* will no longer find all namespace nodes in whose scope is the > element, whose attribute is the current node. ouch ! > 2) more generally, this is an example, showing that the promise will not be > fulfilled that existing XSLT 1.0 transformations will work in XSLT 2.0 as in XSLT > 1.0 i think there is always a bit of tweaking, but your above example is a very painful example. i can see implementators putting in a special switch to force namespace copying to all descendant nodes yuk, jim fuller XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Namespace incompatibility b/n, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | RE: [xsl] Namespace incompatibility, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] XSLT courses, G. Ken Holman | Date | [xsl] Re: XPath Question (correctio, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |