Re: [xsl] XML Schema/XSL conflict (can't differentiate unqualified locals)?

Subject: Re: [xsl] XML Schema/XSL conflict (can't differentiate unqualified locals)?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:20:58 +0100
  

   >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Kay <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

       Michael> You can say xmlns="" to cancel the default namespace
       Michael> declaration, but you can't do xmlns:xyz="" to cancel a
       Michael> non-default namespace declaration.

   Ah - now I can see it in the recommendation - I had overlooked that - thanks.
   

Although this isn't as arbitrary as it might seem. While  xmlns=""  is
described as cancelling the default declaration, another way to look at
it (which is essentially the way XPath looks at it) is to say that it
binds the null prefix to the null namespace. After that <x/> isn't an
error it just denotes x in no namespace.

Conversely if  xmlns:x="" were allowed to unbind the prefix x:x then
<x:x/> would go from being namespace well formed to being a namespace
error.

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread