Subject: Re: [xsl] XML Schema/XSL conflict (can't differentiate unqualified locals)? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:20:58 +0100 |
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Kay <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Michael> You can say xmlns="" to cancel the default namespace Michael> declaration, but you can't do xmlns:xyz="" to cancel a Michael> non-default namespace declaration. Ah - now I can see it in the recommendation - I had overlooked that - thanks. Although this isn't as arbitrary as it might seem. While xmlns="" is described as cancelling the default declaration, another way to look at it (which is essentially the way XPath looks at it) is to say that it binds the null prefix to the null namespace. After that <x/> isn't an error it just denotes x in no namespace. Conversely if xmlns:x="" were allowed to unbind the prefix x:x then <x:x/> would go from being namespace well formed to being a namespace error. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XML Schema/XSL conflict (, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] XML Schema/XSL conflict (, cutlass |
RE: [xsl] Numbering, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] keys and idrefs - XSLT2 r, David Carlisle |
Month |