Subject: Re: [xsl] keys and idrefs - XSLT2 request? From: ht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henry S. Thompson) Date: 15 Oct 2001 16:53:25 +0100 |
Note that the XML Schema REC defines a level of conformance which does _not_ require any knowledge about the XML representation of schemas in schema documents, so conformant processors don't necessarily have to do all the work involved in that (about 2/3rds of my XML Schema processor). I would certainly favour making it clearer in a subsequent W3C XML Schema version just how little you can get away with and still be conformant, which is presumably precisely what an XSLT 2.0 implementor would want to hear. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] keys and idrefs - XSLT2 r, cutlass | Thread | Re: [xsl] keys and idrefs - XSLT2 r, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] function text(), Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] keys and idrefs - XSLT2 r, David Carlisle |
Month |