Subject: RE: [xsl] schema-1 (was something about keys, a long while ago) From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:35:37 -0500 |
>> > But that's not the whole picture, > You mean, there's life outside xsl-list? Heresy! Well, sometimes it's not much of a life, but it's a life... > in my last message I did actually draft a suggestion that you could > easily pull out this mapping from the schema instance using xslt 1.0 > features, and generate your actual working stylesheet from that, > but Jeni in a parallel thread pointed out that this was just the > typical sort of game of the sad people on this list were happy to do > but that normal folks had a right to some system support for this, > so I pulled the paragraph before posting, but see now you've provoked me > to post it anyway. So now I've got a XSLt parsing my schema to generate a XSLt to parse my XML? You're right many of the people on this list might be ok with that, but I sure can't foist that on my development group in general... > We're told that XSLT x.y is delayed while > they sort out schema support (amongst other things) and that seems like > a big job and its not at all clear it's really worth the wait when > xslt 1.1 minus any bits of it that were contentious wouldn't have been a > wait at all and provided some immediately useful functionality. Heck, I'm not really sure if any of this is worth the wait. But lest I get permanently branded a heretic I'll refrain from exploring that thought further. I do actually support the view that schema support should be a low priority. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] schema-1 (was something a, Joerg Pietschmann | Thread | RE: [xsl] schema-1 (was something a, Hunsberger, Peter |
Re: [xsl] actual path of XSL-file, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] xsl:number again, Michael Kay |
Month |